https://www.selleckchem.com/Bcl-2.html
This was also true for the GlideScope™ when a tube guide was used (OR=3.54; 95% CrI, 1.05-12.5. Only the Airway Scope™ had a better probability of first-pass success compared with the Macintosh when manual-in-line stabilisation (MILS) was used as the immobilisation technique (OR=7.98; 95% CrI, 1.06-73.0. For intubation performed with cervical immobilisation, seven devices had a better probability of first-pass success compared with the Macintosh. However, more studies using MILS (rather than a cervical collar or other alternative) are needed,
Like
Comment
Share
